Olaf.Spinczyk at informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Sat Dec 2 13:01:12 CET 2006
I can't recommend to use Puma's match mechanism. We haven't changed it
since we wrote the old manual, but we also haven't used and maintained
it, too. Therefore, I am not surprised that it doesn't work. I also have
to say that our experience several years ago was that it is not very
Is the match mechanism an essential feature for you?
Robert Scott wrote:
> How similar is the current MatchCollector's matching syntax to that in the
> 2001 Puma paper?
> I'm having troubles getting it to, well, do anything. Am I completely barking
> up the wrong tree in following the 2001 documentation for it?
> I would dive right into the source, but Puma all of a sudden has started to
> refuse to build a debug version. And manually following virtual tables
> through source is really slow.
> aspectc-user mailing list
> aspectc-user at aspectc.org
More information about the aspectc-user