[aspectc-user] MatchCollector

[Olaf Spinczyk]

Hi,

I can't recommend to use Puma's match mechanism. We haven't changed it 
since we wrote the old manual, but we also haven't used and maintained 
it, too. Therefore, I am not surprised that it doesn't work. I also have 
to say that our experience several years ago was that it is not very 
efficient.

Is the match mechanism an essential feature for you?

- Olaf


Robert Scott wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> How similar is the current MatchCollector's matching syntax to that in the 
> 2001 Puma paper?
> 
> I'm having troubles getting it to, well, do anything. Am I completely barking 
> up the wrong tree in following the 2001 documentation for it?
> 
> I would dive right into the source, but Puma all of a sudden has started to 
> refuse to build a debug version. And manually following virtual tables 
> through source is really slow.
> 
> 
> robert.
> _______________________________________________
> aspectc-user mailing list
> aspectc-user at aspectc.org
> http://www.aspectc.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectc-user