[aspectc-user] Re: Improved support for C++ exceptions?

Olaf Spinczyk os at aspectc.org
Mon Nov 21 19:52:01 CET 2011


I'm not even sure whether they are used for the compilation of our 
Debian packages. Puma and AspectC++ will probably work without these 
options. Simply remove them from Puma/vars.mk before compilation and 
give it a try. For me it's just a matter of performance and code size.

My main business is in the area of embedded system software and here my 
experience was that these two options make a significant difference. It 
is possible that this assumption does not hold for a 100000 loc project 
such as Puma.



Am 21.11.2011 19:27, schrieb Markus Elfring:
>> So, I would prefer if -fno-exceptions and -fno-rtti remain at least 
>> an option.
> I find these compiler settings fine as configuration options. Is it 
> possible to work with Puma and AspectC++ without their limitations?
> Regards,
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> aspectc-user mailing list
> aspectc-user at aspectc.org
> http://www.aspectc.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectc-user

More information about the aspectc-user mailing list